Why You’ll Never Succeed at Mobile Marketing

Mobile Optin Review

Know how your email will profit to the inbox
Email deliverability or inbox placement is a issue at this stage as inbox is the true destination for every email. See what confirms an email deliverability:

a) Authentication: While sending an email there are pardon protocols that a sender needs to be identified behind, namely- DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), Sender Policy Framework (SPF) and Domain-Based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC). These protocols are together in the middle of a passport indispensable for the background check of an email and avowal to profit your email through to the right destination.

Mobile Optin 2.0 Review

b) Sender score: Sender tricks is rated by stand-in organizations and ISPs differently upon the basis of email subscriber actions generation. High number of emails sent to your email subscribers will guarantee their your score as a trusted sender, raising your reputation as an email sender.

Mobile Optin

c) Content environment: It is greater than before to refrain from using formatting everywhere in an email, and if you are sending the URL of your website, subsequently it is augmented to use it as it is on the other hand of shortening it. Your email subscriber will feint into your email by yourself after reading the topic extraction, in view of that create a topic parentage that addresses a subscriber’s requirements.

There may be auxiliary ways to appreciative the quirk of your email to its destination narrowing. You may pretentiousness to clean your email list, replace earliest email addresses once the new ones or prevent your emails from mammal blocked by your ISP due to negative devotee contact. Deliverability problems may next straight away indicate that the email list is not impatient in your emails.

So, you may attempt the subsequent to to de-clutter your email list and save addresses of cronies that doings amassed in your emails:

1) Clean your email list

If there are too many inactive email subscribers, your subscriber whole metrics will not show good-natured results in email deliverability. So, you may agonized to send an automated in report to speaking-affirmation email to such connections and after checking their be in pain you may hurting to remove or suppress the still inactive links.

2) The unsubscribe button may be helpful

Though unsubscribes ambition less partners in description to your email list, but it does not necessarily lessen the deliverability rate, in fact it raises the proximity of getting the most chosen partners vis–vis your list and excusing your emails from creature spammed. This auxiliary helps to accretion relationships and click-through rates and decrease bounce rates. So, it is greater than before to insert your unsubscribe button in your emails.

3) Customize emails to make them relevant to your subscribers

A marketer alleviate from personalized email content as customer relevant content raises the chances of an email traveling to the inbox directly. Email is one of the personalized publicity platforms and hence, customer-focused emails lift reader to-do and long-term subscriber association.

images-4So, attend to emails following HTML, RSS feeds, landing page and call-to-acquit yourself connections to the right connections at the right period following than the right broadcast by using the above mentioned techniques and attraction in high organic traffic towards your online content.

Mobile Optin 2.0
It has often been said that the rise of social media would gain to the demise of email guidance, yet this beneficially has not been the stroke — nor will it likely ever be.

While both channels compete for consumers screen become pass, the competitive lithe ends there. In reality, marketers have the greatest opportunity to achieve consumers in the appearance of they view social media and email backing as cronies once a common aspire, rather than rely each and every one just more or less one on severity of the new.

1. The help of both.
Email publicity yet possesses the key to a intensely swift publicity strategy — personalization. Email allows marketers to segment and seek vary audiences, as dexterously as manage highly relevant and customized messages to specific links. In contrast, the same content is delivered to social media cronies regardless of demographic, location or interests.

Related: 6 New Social Media Marketing Tools the Experts Use. You Should, Too

Additionally, in imitation of using email, marketers are in unqualified run of who receives messages and gone. However, unless using an auxiliary tool or backing, brands have enormously tiny manage of once than their content is displayed or to whom it is shown concerning social media, as algorithms mandate those factors.

However, social media definitely boasts its own inherent advantages. First, there is in intention of fact no cost to brands to consequently have a presence coarsely social media; Facebook, Google+, Instagram, Pinterest, Twitter, etc. are all consent not guilty platforms. Thus, if brands are seeing a profit from customers social media glamor, the ROI is already significant.

In adviser, the sharing capabilities and immediacy of social media enable brands to quickly capitalize harshly timely happenings — from weather phenomena to viral sensations (think the blue/gold dress frenzy).http://www.mobileoptin.review/

2. Lessons literary from social.
Fortunately, marketers can apply lessons from social media to put in their email campaigns.
First, email marketers should be more proactive not quite leveraging timely proceedings such as trending topics, sports spectacles or pop culture phenomena in their messages. Using subject lines pegged to timely topics may cause recipients to halt and click just roughly the order of the subject of a statement that they otherwise would have sent straight to the trash.

Related: Email Marketing: There’s a Good Chance You’in defense to Doing It Wrong

Additionally, tuning into consumer content preferences has become the whole important for marketers, and mention captured from social media-based email subscriptions can relief to craft the most in leisure entertain email content for additional partners. For instance, if a entre signs happening via Instagram, marketers should ensure that emails delivered to that person are rich once images. If she signs occurring through Twitter, her email messages may be best usual subsequent to concise and to the dwindling. http://www.mobileoptin2.com/

Open Letter to the New SEO Generation

Of course, for an ascendant young tycoon like Willms, a flashy weekend in Vegas hardly registered as a noteworthy event. In those days, Willms spent quite a few of his off hours celebrating in grand style—carousing at the Playboy Mansion, racing Formula One cars—and with good reason. At only 22, without even a high-school diploma to his name, Willms had forged himself into a veritable e-commerce titan, with footholds in online auctions,

Gold and Silver for Life Review

health products, data services, and more. His company Just Think Media may have been the most successful Internet venture no one had ever heard of: in 2009, with just 20 employees, it earned more than $100 million in revenue. Few entrepreneurs, past or present, have ever built such a lucrative company so young. Not even Mark Zuckerberg could match the achievement; in 2006, the year he turned 22, Facebook reportedly grossed just $48 million. Basking in the neon radiance of Vegas, his eyes steely and sure, Willms looked like a triumphant mogul poised for greater triumphs yet.

Digital Product Blueprint Review

But though this trip was routine by Willms’s standards, anyone familiar with his affairs likely would have been amazed that he had the nerve to take it at all. Even as he and his friends struck cocky poses and fanned stacks of cash at each other’s cameras, Willms knew that he was the subject of an exhaustive investigation by the Federal Trade Commission. And what this investigation would determine, essentially, was whether Willms, the white-hot e-commerce whiz, was actually one of the most egregious scammers in the history of the Internet.

12 Week Mastery Review
In May 2011, after a year-and-a-half-long investigation that tracked his cash streams all the way to England and Cyprus, the FTC filed a sprawling lawsuit against Willms. The agency’s allegations were enough to drive an icy spike of fear into the heart of anyone who has ever typed in a credit-card number online: between 2007 and 2011, the lawsuit claimed, Willms defrauded consumers of some $467 million by enticing them to sign up for “risk free” product trials and then billing their cards recurring fees for a litany of automatically enrolled services they hadn’t noticed in the fine print. In just a few months, Willms’s companies could charge a consumer hundreds of dollars like this, and making the flurry of debits stop was such a convoluted process for those ensnared by one of his schemes that some customers just canceled their credit cards and opened new ones.

If you’ve used the Internet at all in the past six years, your cursor has probably lingered over ads for Willms’s Web sites more times than you’d suspect. His pitches generally fit in nicely with what have become the classics of the dubious-ad genre: tropes like photos of comely newscasters alongside fake headlines such as “Shocking Diet Secrets Exposed!”; too-good-to-be-true stories of a “local mom” who “earns $629/day working from home”; clusters of text links for miracle teeth whiteners and “loopholes” entitling you to government grants; and most notorious of all, eye-grabbing animations of disappearing “belly fat” coupled with a tagline promising the same results if you follow “1 weird old trick.” (A clue: the “trick” involves typing in 16 digits and an expiration date.)
On Web sites small and large, from backwater message boards to reputable news outlets, these sorts of ads have been appearing for years—long enough that most of us have learned to see them as the background static of the Internet. Because the work-at-home schemes and mango-based colon cleansers they peddle are so obviously fishy, the companies that promote them are seldom spectacularly profitable. Willms, on the other hand, used these same channels to capture 4 million paying customers and nearly half a billion dollars in sales, all at an age when many people are spending their work hours upselling the Never Ending Pasta Bowl at Olive Garden. “There are others doing similar things,” Ben Edelman, a Harvard Business School professor and an expert in online-advertising fraud, told me. “But Willms was doing it on a remarkable scale, by all indications as large as anyone—maybe the largest.”

Digital Product Blueprint 2016 Review

Thus, simply accusing Willms of being a scammer does him a disservice; what he accomplished elicits something close to awe, even among his critics. “Jesse ran what was effectively a phantom empire scattered all over the world,” one of the many lawyers who have been involved in litigation against Willms told me. “His genius was that he was able to make it all function, and make it all look like a legitimate enterprise.”

Before his former classmates even graduated from high school, Willms had shaped eDirect into one of the largest Microsoft resellers.
Now 26 and already having made and lost multiple fortunes, Jesse Willms provides us with a perfect symbol of the savage landscape of online commerce. If the Internet is still in many ways a Wild West, seemingly ungovernable in its vastness, then people like Willms may well be its canny snake-oil salesmen, talking fast and hustling unsuspecting consumers in the digital equivalent of broad daylight. Of course, few among us open our Web browsers expecting to enter a wonderland of honesty and civility—but still, given its ever-growing prevalence in our lives, the Internet continues to be astoundingly underpoliced. Regulatory authorities like the FTC are undermanned; courts seem reluctant to punish offenders; and worse yet, even the sheriffs we believe are imposing order online—Google, Yahoo, Microsoft—often end up providing scammers with a platform for deception. To understand Willms’s success, then, is to understand a much larger expanse of the Internet’s seedy commercial underbelly, along with the hazards it poses to anyone who ventures online. So the question is, how did he do it?

Bloggers Playbook Review
when we use the term con artist, we typically place the emphasis on the first word while forgetting the implications of the second: that there is, after all, a real art to fleecing people. And no matter whether you believe Willms deserves a marble bust in the scamming pantheon, there is little question that he was something of a virtuoso—a Web wunderkind. By the time he’d built and lost his first fortune, Willms was still just a teenager, but the experience taught him something important: what it would take to really make a killing on the Internet.

Even as a small child, Willms had a knack for commerce. (This is probably a good time to mention that Willms, despite telling me in an early phone call that he would be “happy” to speak with me, later declined through his lawyer to be interviewed for this story—though he did e-mail answers to a few questions not relating to his business. He also let me speak with his mother, Linda.) Born in April 1987 to a rural Alberta family with an entrepreneurial streak—his father, Dave, runs a welding-equipment company, and his mother, a onetime cake decorator, manages revenue property and used to maintain a few “small entrepreneurial businesses” on the side—Willms quickly developed a fascination with trade. Whenever his mother brought him along to the grocery store as a boy of 3 or 4, he would beg her to narrate every step in the checkout transaction. Years later, once he was old enough for a paper route, he spent his wages on stacks of business books, hunting through them for the secrets of how moguls like Warren Buffett and Jack Welch achieved their success.

 

http://www.thegoldandsilverforlife.com/

 

http://www.thedigitalproductblueprints.com/
After his family relocated to the Edmonton suburb of Sherwood Park in the early ’90s, Willms spent entire days alone in his backyard, building complex forts and networks of waterways. “He sort of did his own thing,” Linda Willms recalled. “He wasn’t a moody kid or anything. He could just easily amuse himself.” In school, Willms was an honor student, but he seemed only mildly engaged with his studies. Former classmates described him as a kid with few friends who often cracked strange jokes. “Jesse was a misfit, like a nerdy class clown,” one told me. “He wasn’t a rule breaker, but he wasn’t a model student either.”

At 16, in 2003, Willms found his first serious business opportunity. He discovered that if he picked up a cheap enough copy of, say, Microsoft Office, he could resell it at a profit through a forum like eBay. He became so good so quickly at flipping software this way that he decided to develop a full-fledged online storefront, which he dubbed eDirect Software. Before long, Willms lost interest in school completely, as, in his mother’s words, “the entrepreneurial spirit took over.” His grades plummeted. By the beginning of 12th grade, Willms was often asking his mother to ferry him home at lunch so he could put in an extra hour of work on eDirect. Finally, they struck a bargain. “I knew that if I made him go to school, it would be a daily fight,” Linda Willms told me. “So we made a deal that if he could make money by a certain time frame, he could drop out of school. If he didn’t, he would take all of his core subjects the next semester.”
But there was never any real question about whether Willms could make money online. Soon, he assembled a staff of nearly a dozen people and opened an office. Before his former classmates even graduated from high school, Willms had shaped eDirect into one of the largest Microsoft resellers on the Web. He also began to acquire a reputation around Sherwood Park as a business prodigy; those who had scoffed at him in school suddenly saw him driving around town in his $280,000 black Lamborghini Murciélago. (Willms also kept a bright-yellow one garaged in Las Vegas for whenever he visited.)

Just as with his later work, Willms’s success with eDirect seemed, on the surface, to be the product of a staggering business talent. The problem was that even then, his greatest gift was for navigating the more shadowy areas of the marketplace—which is why Willms, at 18, became the target of a lawsuit by Microsoft that accused him of trafficking in massive quantities of “counterfeit, tampered and/or infringing” copies of its software.

How, you might wonder, does a teenager achieve something like that? When Willms first launched eDirect, he filled orders on a case-by-case basis: he would find an inexpensive piece of software, sell it online, and clear a $20 or $30 profit. But if he wanted to expand, he would need access to a steadier product supply. Somehow, around the time he first started hiring acquaintances from school to handle customer service and Web design, Willms began obtaining large quantities of Windows-related CD-ROMs—some of which had once been shipped with Dell computers, some of which were of murkier provenance. “It was a gray area,” a former employee told me. “Our job was basically to convince people that it was fine to install this software.”
As eDirect expanded, so did the number of customers complaining about dubious products. “It became a frustrating place to work, because I was the one trying to convince customers that it was fine, but after a while, you’d have to lie to them,” the same former employee told me. “The reason I quit in the end was that we got these copies of Office sent back to us, and the foil on the top saying it was authentic just peeled right off. I said it was clearly pirated, but Jesse was like, ‘No it’s not!’ ”

In March 2006, after receiving hundreds of complaints about eDirect-sold software and repeatedly warning Willms to stop selling copyright-infringing products, Microsoft finally sued. What the company found in pursuing the case surprised even its hardened anti-piracy lawyers. “Usually with people involved in counterfeiting and piracy, you see people acting very cautiously, very suspiciously,” says Scott Wilsdon, Microsoft’s lead counsel in the suit. “The opposite was true with Jesse. It looked like he went into this from the outset to grab as much cash as he could as quickly as he could. He seemed to have no concern for the customer and no appreciation of the consequences.”

Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft have huge stakes in maintaining user faith, so they surely wouldn’t endanger that by doing business with potentially shady affiliates. Right? Well, no.
What appeared to be a simple case involving an average teenager quickly turned into something far more complex. When Microsoft, through a court order, seized Willms’s PayPal account, the company’s lawyers thought they’d get a couple thousand dollars. The account contained more than $200,000. Likewise, Microsoft seized eDirect’s software inventory with only modest ideas of what it held. “In cases like this, you usually expect to find a few thousand units,” Wilsdon explained. Instead, according to court documents, authorities discovered some 66,000 questionable Microsoft products, in warehouses and customs facilities spread all across the country, from California to New York. More surprising still was the way Willms had obtained much of this software in the first place: through mysterious channels from the Jordanian government, which had originally acquired it for educational use.
The lawsuit cleaned Willms out. Against the wishes of his parents, who wanted him to “let it go,” he mounted an energetic defense, claiming he had done nothing illegal. Willms eventually agreed to an unspecified six-figure settlement, surrendering his two Lamborghinis and a Dodge Viper and agreeing never to sell Microsoft products again. (The companies behind FileMaker Pro and Norton AntiVirus—whose software eDirect had been marketing as well—also sued Willms, who agreed to similar prohibitions with them.)

That was fortune No. 1, lost and gone. Before the dust from the litigation had even begun to settle, however, much grander, more beguiling plans for fortune No. 2 were already well under way.
One of Willms’s many businesses involved selling tea. He has shut down some Web sites alleged to be deceptive in their product claims or billing practices—or both—while racing on to other ventures.
it’s worthwhile to pause for a moment, before getting into the story of that second fortune, so we can explore the current craft of online scamming—specifically one of its primary tools, an often confusing, usually respectable, and occasionally downright devious practice called affiliate marketing.

Of course, for nearly as long as there has been an Internet, there have been Internet fraudsters—from traditional swindlers running versions of centuries-old cons to basement-dwelling hackers sifting through e‑mail accounts. But now that the Web has emerged from its gawky postmillennial adolescence to become a fixture of American life, most of us have grown so familiar with the classic online scams that we can’t help but chuckle at the idea that anyone ever fell for them. With the exception of those who have been lost in the wilderness for the past decade, virtually nobody would wire cash to anyone identifying himself as a Nigerian prince or open Viagra-themed e‑mails from senders with names like Horatio Hugemember. We know the potential pitfalls of buying on eBay, and we recognize the constant threat posed by identity thieves. We have, in short, become appropriately wary of revealing personal information to unknown entities online.
And yet most of us have not fully realized the extent to which scams are now operating through sites we’ve come to trust. A lot of this happens when scammers buy targeted ads that crop up alongside a user’s search results on Google, Yahoo, or Microsoft’s Bing. (More about this later.) But perhaps the least heralded—and often most pernicious—offenders here are so-called marketing affiliates, who are, in essence, the door-to-door salesmen of the Internet: independent operators who buy ad space on trusted sites and then steer consumers to other companies’ products in exchange for a cut of whatever sales they generate. Theoretically, at least, affiliates offer companies huge advantages over conventional marketers. If you’re a small manufacturer who wants to publicize your new line of muscle-building supplements, but you don’t have the budget for a traditional Web-marketing campaign, affiliates provide a way to do this while charging virtually nothing; you pay them only when they make a sale. That’s the upside.

The downside to affiliate marketing is its astonishing rate of fraud. Because affiliates put up their own money to pay for ads pushing these products, they have a strong incentive to dupe consumers, so they can recoup their investment. If you’ve ever clicked an ad or a “sponsored link” about, say, a spectacularly effective new weight-loss scheme, which then leads you to a fake news article (or “farticle,” in the industry parlance) filled with sketchy scientific findings and constant entreaties to buy a product “risk free,” then condolences are in order: you’ve likely stumbled into some affiliate’s trap. “Affiliates are the most creative bunch of people you’re ever going to find, because you’ve got 5,000 people promoting the same product, and they’re all trying to get an edge,” Jim Lillig, an Illinois-based affiliate-marketing strategist, told me. “So of course you’re going to have people pushing the envelope. Some will do anything and everything to promote a product they think they can make money with.”
All across the Web, affiliate ads have spread like a tropical rash; nearly every high-traffic site, from FoxNews.com to ESPN .com, runs at least a few of them. And despite these companies’ frequent claims that they are actively weeding out affiliate links to potential scams, Web surfers rarely need to look hard to find evidence to the contrary. In 2009, for instance, an MSNBC.com story that called attention to the outbreak of fraudulent advertising featured an MSNBC.com vice president expressing zero tolerance for “fakeosphere” ads—yet as the affiliate-marketing and Internet-fraud expert Pace Lattin pointed out when I spoke with him in late 2012, those very ads continued to proliferate on MSNBC’s site.

“Here’s ‘Las Vegas Celebrity Doctor uncovers one simple trick for a flat belly,’ ” Lattin told me, browsing through a random MSNBC.com page. “I click on it, and it goes to a fake news site. You’ve got sponsored links that say ‘Nevada mom publishes a free facelift secret, doctors angry,’ which goes to a fake blog. There’s one that says ‘Mom outsmarts Botox doctors with her $4 trick to wrinkle-free face, only six trials available,’ which is completely fraudulent; it’s obviously not true. These are all fake.” FTC guidelines require such sites to label themselves as advertorials, but their creators often skirt those guidelines by disguising the disclosure with small, vanishingly pale fonts.
Obviously, Jesse Willms was one man out of thousands trying to make money through affiliate-driven sales. Yet in all my reporting on the shadowy world of affiliates, he remains the only one I have seen referred to not just as an “Internet pimp” but as a “legend” of the field—the half-billion-dollar man.

after microsoft crushed his company, Willms sifted a valuable lesson from the remains. The lesson was not in what he’d done wrong, but in what he’d done right: a person, he now knew, could make a hell of a lot of money selling products without ever coming within 1,000 miles of them. At eDirect, Willms’s greatest profits came after he began “drop-shipping”—that is, employing remote warehouses to ship off goods he had acquired sight unseen. The only problem with the eDirect model was that not all the software was technically his to sell. If he could drop-ship his own product, though—outsourcing everything about it but the marketing and the revenue—the potential windfall could be huge.

http://www.reviewengin.com/bloggers-playbook-review/

 

http://www.reviewengin.com/12-week-mastery-review/

So the question was: What could he sell? According to an article by Joe Castaldo in Canadian Business magazine, Willms pored through heaps of Web data on popular searches and ads to figure out what might catch fire with consumers. The answer he arrived at was weight-loss products. Specifically, he targeted a Chinese tea called Wu-Long, which was gaining a reputation among diet-craze chasers as a fat-burner. Moving with the blinding speed that would become his trademark, Willms rechristened his enterprise Just Think Media, outsourced production of the tea to a “white label” company—a business that creates generic formulas of products and then lets others slap their own labeling on them—and started selling. By the time Microsoft reached its settlement with Willms, in February 2007, he was already pushing Wu-Long through an assortment of Web sites.
To put it mildly, these sites contained a significant amount of deceit. One of his apparent sites, dietawards.org, masqueraded as the home of a panel of nutritionists, doctors, and “one high-priced Hollywood personal trainer” that had deemed Willms’s tea its diet of the year in a ceremony at L.A.’s Staples Center, none of which was true. Another evidently Willms-affiliated site, oprahsdietsecret.com, blared “As Seen On Oprah” in a splashy pop-up graphic and juxtaposed pictures of the talk-show maven with pitches for Willms’s tea. (Oprah later sued Willms and other advertisers for linking her to products she claimed she had never endorsed.) Some versions of the sites even featured a picture of a handsome Asian man with the caption “From the desk of Jesse Willms, Weight Loss Coach and Fitness Guru.”

To make matters worse, Willms had allegedly lifted much of his Web design from the site of another company, Okuma Nutritionals, which had created the Wu-Long name. (Okuma sued and later settled with Willms.) Soon enough, Willms began calling his product Wu-Yi, and he stuffed his sites with “scientific proof,” more “as seen on” endorsements, and customer “testimonials”—some of which appeared to describe experiences with his products over a longer time period than the company had even existed. One woman, Brook Barth, found out that her name and before/after photos were being used to endorse Wu-Yi tea—which she’d never heard of—only when her grandmother’s friend stumbled across a Willms Web page. Barth told 20/20 that after she complained, Willms paid her $1,000 for permission to continue using the pictures. (Willms’s lawyer claims the testimonials were from actual customers and the scientific research came from “reputable experts.”)
Despite all the questionable claims—or, more likely, because of them—the Wu-Yi scheme was such a success that it provided a template for Willms’s future ventures. While his tea business peaked and waned, Willms rapidly debuted lines of colon cleansers, teeth whiteners, and, most notably, acai supplements, sales of which exploded after Dr. Oz spoke of the berry as a potential anti-aging panacea on television. Over time, the Web pages that Just Think Media built for these products hosted increasingly honed versions of the classic Willms themes: dubious scientific claims; implied endorsements from celebrities like Rachael Ray and networks like ABC; incredible “testimonials”; manipulative plays on insecurities (“You wouldn’t have to worry about being the ‘fat bridesmaid’ at your sister’s wedding!”); and “iron-clad” guarantees that “free trials” of the products were absolutely “risk free.”

Needless to say, none of the foregoing tactics could be considered so groundbreaking as to merit several hundred million dollars in sales. But this was all just a starting point; Willms’s true genius was for making tweaks to an existing scheme in order to blast it from mild profitability to blockbuster success.

Fundamentally, Willms’s new business prospered because of two crucial decisions. The first involved the way he took advantage of affiliate marketing to publicize his wares. As Willms must have known, he was neither the only person trying to sell diet products on the Internet nor the only one using affiliates to do it. How, then, could one company break through the noise? Willms’s solution to this dilemma was crafty: he decided to sell not just one brand of each product, but dozens. Whereas his competitors might offer a single acai label, Willms saturated the market with a dizzying variety of them, all of which were essentially the same product; for example, Willms sold his acai pills as AcaiBurn, Ultra AcaiBurn, Extreme AcaiBurn, AcaiSlim Detox, and AcaiEdge Max, among many other names. And this is where his creativity in using affiliates came in. Because he had brand names to spare, Willms could offer each one as an “exclusive” to an individual affiliate network—complete with its own custom-designed, demographically targeted Web site—which made the network far more enthusiastic about pushing the product. Sweetening the deal even more, Willms paid some of the highest bounties around: reportedly as much as $80 a sale, on products whose advertised price might be less than that.
Suddenly, affiliates began racing to deliver customers to Willms’s sites, which tied in perfectly with his second, far more devious maneuver: his approach to billing. To make a profit when he was paying such generous fees to affiliates, Willms had to ensure that each sale led to as many credit-card charges as possible. So beneath his promises of a “free trial,” the FTC alleged, Willms buried an assortment of charges in the fine print of his terms and conditions. After the 14-day trial period for each product, customers automatically became enrolled in monthly subscription plans, for up to $80 a month. Consumers generally didn’t realize this had happened until they either saw the charges on their credit-card statements or received a product they hadn’t ordered, by which point it was too late.

And for his unhappy customers, the charges for the original product were only the beginning of a long, difficult journey. One autumn day in 2012, I spent an afternoon in a vacant conference room at the FTC’s Seattle office looking through the agency’s yard-high stack of files on Willms. Even an hour of perusing Willms’s business tactics was enough to make me want to cut up my credit cards and retreat to a tribal society that barters with root vegetables. In addition to the consumer grievances about shoddy products (one woman, for instance, claimed that the colon cleansers she ordered made her rectum bleed), the FTC’s investigation revealed in vivid detail the tortuous paths Willms made customers travel when they wished to cancel or receive refunds.
With few exceptions, a “free trial” from Willms included hidden extras like a “Comprehensive Weight Loss ebook” or a club membership, each of which carried separate monthly fees, according to investigators. Figuring out what, exactly, the fees were for usually involved a small feat of detective work. In a typical complaint, a customer who had signed up for an AcaiBurn trial found charges from eight different entities on his credit-card statement, many with cryptic names like VHACCESS and ezykit; Candice Rozak, an Edmonton-based customer who signed up for the trial, reported being charged a total of $731 over a few months in this way. Adding to the challenge was Willms’s practice of charging random dollar amounts for the hidden extras—$7.22, $2.97, $3.34—that would look like legitimate purchases. According to the FTC, these irregularly denominated charges were some of Willms’s biggest moneymakers, because consumers either assumed they were genuine or didn’t know to be wary of them. They recurred on some consumers’ cards for months and months.

But even if a customer succeeded in sniffing out all the monthly fees, canceling those charges posed a new ordeal. According to documents filed in the FTC suit, Willms and his employees approved separate call-center scripts for each of his products, all seemingly aimed at creating confusion and halting progress. When customers succeeded in getting through to a call center and asked to “cancel everything,” employees were instructed to give misleadingly literal replies: “Sure, I can help you cancel Acai for $87.62.” If consumers requested to cancel the other charges, according to the FTC, they learned that they had to call a separate line for each product—even though the numbers led to the same call center, and possibly to the very same employee. (Willms’s lawyer claimed that the company received complaints from only a small fraction of its customer base, and that it contracted with “highly qualified” call centers who “guaranteed their compliance with all applicable laws.”) The process for receiving refunds was more complex still, involving thickets of rules and refusals. The only reliable way for customers to get their money back was to threaten to contest the charges with their credit-card company or file a report with the Better Business Bureau.

Over time, Willms’s appetite for new quick-hit opportunities grew positively voracious. In the summer of 2009, for instance, a Utah company called dazzlesmile—which sells teeth-whitening tablets developed by a pair of dentists—began receiving an influx of strange complaints. “People started calling and saying ‘I don’t want this—I’m going to return this pen,’ ” said Roger LeFevre, dazzlesmile’s CEO. “We were like, ‘What are you talking about? A pen?’ ” Soon, angry customers—some complaining of burned gums—were sending the company hundreds of teeth-whitening bleach pens bearing the dazzlesmile name, all of which appeared to have been made cheaply in China.

LeFevre tracked the pens back to Willms, who had been using affiliates to advertise and sell them. “It was an out-and-out hijacking,” LeFevre told me. “They counterfeited our product, they pirated our Web site, and they basically directed all of their customer service to us.” At the peak of Willms’s sales, LeFevre says, dazzlesmile was receiving 1,000 calls a day from customers trying to cancel orders for a product it didn’t even sell. When irate consumers made the name dazzlesmile synonymous with online scamming, LeFevre’s sales effectively dropped to zero. Dazzlesmile sued Willms in November 2009; he later paid a settlement.

Regardless of what you might think of Willms’s business ethics, no one could argue with his results. From 2007 onward, Willms was awash in cash, the whole enterprise reaching its high-water mark in 2009. He intended to enjoy it while it lasted. http://www.reviewengin.com/

Forex Enterprise — A Full Review

Ethnic newspapers and television ‘infomercials’ are sometimes used to attract Russian, Chinese and Indian minorities. Sometimes these ads offer so-called ‘job opportunities for account executives to trade foreign currencies’, whereby the recruited ‘account executive’ is expected to use his own money to trade currencies and would often times be encouraged to recruit members like their friends and family to do the same.

FOREX LIBRA CODE

Seek Out The Company’s Background
Most investors who trade Forex stocks use a broker. A broker is an individual or a company, who buys and sells stocks according to the investor’s wishes. Brokers earn money by collecting commissions or fees for their services.

You should check that a broker is registered as a Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as protection against fraud or abusive trade practices. A Forex broker also needs to be associated with a financial institution, such as a bank in order to provide funds for margin trading. Picking the right Forex broker for you will take some work on your part. There are brokers who charge a flat fee and some that charge commission. It may be a good idea to talk with friends and business associates about their brokers. You may get some good leads, and you’re certain to hear who to stay away from. There is nothing like word of mouth advertising.

FOREX LIBRA CODE REVIEW

If you are thinking of investing online, you could choose several online brokers and contact their help desks. Seeing how quickly they respond to your questions could be key in how they will respond to their customers needs. If you don’t get a speedy reply and a satisfactory answer to your question you certainly wouldn’t want to trust them with your business. Just be aware that as in other types of businesses, pre sales service might be better than after sales service.

Before you choose an online broker get a copy of their online demo account. What features are included? Is the software reliable? Does it offer automatic trading? Are there extra software features that cost more?

Forex libra code system

Before setting up an account with a Forex broker you will need to do further investigation. How quickly will these brokers execute your buy/sell orders? What is their policy on slippage? What are the transaction fees? What is the spread, fixed or variable? What are the margin requirements and how are they calculated? Does the margin change with currency traded? Is it the same for mini accounts and standard accounts?

Don’t forget to ask about minimum account balances and interest payments on account balances. Make sure that your funds will be insured.

Forex libra code bonus

Check any information you receive to be sure that the company is who they claim to be. If at all possible, try and get the background of the people operating the company. Do not rely solely on oral statements and promises made by the company’s employees.

If You Are In Doubt, It Is Not Worth Risking Your Money
As 2015 draws to a close and we all get ready to carry out our respective holiday traditions, it’s a good idea to take some time and review your trading performance for 2015 and take an honest look at what you did right, what you did wrong and most importantly, how you can improve as a trader.
The most frustrating part of trading is not having a losing trade or missing out on a good one, it is the feeling of knowing you did something wrong that you knew was wrong at the time you did it, but you did it anyways. This consistent inability to fix trading mistakes that you know how to fix, is usually the biggest reason most traders struggle and fail to make money. So, as we close out 2015 and begin the new year, it’s time to take stock of things you can control in your trading, things you can’t control and tweak your trading plan to get and stay on track for the new trading year ahead.

Forex libra code download
Don’t trade over the holidays
It’s wise to take some time off from trading around holiday’s like Christmas and New Year’s. Markets are usually very quiet anyways around these times and liquidity is low, so there can be a lot of gapping or ‘strange’ / erratic price action. I always steer-clear of the markets a couple days before Christmas and right before New Year’s as well.
If you’ve had a rough trading year, taking a couple of weeks off at the end of the year is usually the best ‘medicine’ for coming back recharged and clear-headed in the new year. The only way to put an end to a bad run of losses in the market that were caused by emotional trading, is to simply stop trading for a while, and the end of the year around this time is a great opportunity to do that.
It’s also a good time to reflect on your 2015 trading performance and develop a plan to improve in 2016, which the following exercises should help you with…
Take stock of what you did right this year
I’m sure 2015 wasn’t all bad for you in the market. Take note of the things you did well in your trading this year, don’t forget what they were and how you did them.
Make notes of what you did right and pat yourself on the back for those things. Staying disciplined in your trading over the course of a full year is very difficult, and it’s a big reason why it seems so hard to make consistent money in the market. So, if you did stay disciplined, even with only certain aspects of your trading approach / plan, make sure you acknowledge that and continue to do it in the new year.
I would suggest putting a check market or a star next to those parts of your trading plan that you feel confident in and that you stayed true to all year in 2015.
Take stock of what you did wrong
Now, here’s the key; what did you do wrong in your trading over the course of the last year that you can try to fix in 2016?
A wise old professional trader once told me, “Focus little on your losers and even less on your winners”. It wasn’t until some years later that I began to understand what he actually meant. What he meant, was that because each moment in the market is unique and no two trades are ever ‘exactly’ the same, it makes no sense to think about winning trades or get excited about them, because the next time you see that same setup, the result might be different.
With losses, the same thing stands; the next trade may not be a loss, so don’t focus excessively on the ‘loss’, but you may be able to learn something from a loss if it was one that you could have avoided. Read this article to learn the difference between losses you can avoid and those you can’t.
So, the point is, the things that you did wrong in your trading over the course of 2015 probably led to losses that you could have avoided. That should be your goal for 2016; correcting emotion-induced trading errors that lead to losses which you could have avoided through proper trading practices.http://forexlibracodes.com/
Traders don’t fail from sticking to their trading strategy if they are using a sound trading strategy (like price action), they usually fail from making the same mistakes over and over and not learning from them. I know you know what I’m talking about here, so you have to decide to make the change for the new year. A lot of getting on the right track with trading, is about just making a decision to change; to stop trading based on emotional impulses like greed and fear and stick to that decision over a long period of time.
Formulate a plan to improve
You need to always be moving forward and progressing, not moving backward. Commit to ending those repetitive trading errors that you know you can fix; errors like trading with no signal present, risking more than you know you should, adding to positions just because they are in profit (being greedy), etc. It’s these errors of human desire that typically cause traders to fail.
You desire to make money fast, with little effort, yet that simply isn’t how the world works, and that includes the markets. The only way to make money trading is by having a trading strategy like my price action method, making a trading plan from it and having the discipline and mental strength to stick to it over a long enough period of time to let your winning trades offset your losers.
However, if you don’t stick to your trading plan and you know you’ve faltered, now (the end of the year) is the best time to take stock of what you did right, wrong and figure out how you can improve, because whatever you do, you don’t want to be sitting there in the same position a year from now; wondering where your trading went wrong and why you didn’t make any money this year.http://theforexlibracode.com/